There is an old expression, “You can’t fight city hall!” This is actually not true, at least with respect to personal injury claims. A city or municipality can be held liable for the negligent acts of its employees. For example, if you are involved in a car accident with a city-owned vehicle, you can sue for damages if there is evidence a city employee’s negligence caused the collision.

Jury Entitled to Believe Testimony of Victims, Witnesses, Instead of Police Officers

Of course, the city will not go down without a (legal) fight. Consider this recent decision from the Ohio Eighth District Court of Appeals here in Cleveland. The court rejected an appeal from the City of East Cleveland of a jury verdict holding it responsible for a 2008 auto accident. The jury ordered the city to pay several million dollars to the victims.

Here is a brief explanation of what happened. The accident occurred early in the morning hours of October 5, 2008. Two East Cleveland police officers were separately patrolling the same bar in their official vehicles. The officers suddenly received a call from a third officer, who was “following a possibly stolen motorcycle,” according to court records.

In the course of responding to the third officer’s call for assistance, one of the officers struck a fourth vehicle, seriously injuring both its driver and passenger. The driver and passenger subsequently filed a personal injury lawsuit against the City of East Cleveland.

Following a trial, a Cuyahoga County jury ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The jury ordered the City to pay approximately $6.1 million in compensatory damages to the injured driver, and over $1.5 million to the injured passenger. The jury also awarded each plaintiff $500,000 in punitive damages, which was assessed against the officer who caused the accident.

The defense appealed the jury’s verdict on multiple grounds. The appeals court overruled all of the City’s objections and upheld the verdict. One of the City’s claims was that the verdict was “against the manifest weight of the evidence,” because the plaintiff driver testified he did not look both ways before proceeding into the intersection where the collision with the police officer occurred. The driver looked to his right but not his left.

But as the appeals court explained, the plaintiff had a green light at the intersection in question at the time. Furthermore, despite responding to the third officer’s call, the plaintiff and other witnesses said they never saw any police vehicles with their emergency lights or sirens activated. There was therefore “no reason” for the plaintiff to have looked to his left before proceeding on a green light. And while the two police officers testified they had the green light and did activate their lights and sirens, the appeals court said “it was for the jury to decide whom and what to believe.”

Contact the Cleveland Personal Injury Lawyers at Tittle & Perlmuter Today

The verdict in this case illustrates that even when the defendants are police officers, juries are still able to rationally and impartially review the evidence and come to a decision that compensates accident victims for their injuries.

If you have been injured in an auto accident and need assistance in pursuing a claim against the responsible parties, call the Cleveland personal injury lawyers at Tittle & Perlmuter at (216) 308-1522 today.

  • I was in a car accident. The insurance company only offered $2,500 to settle my car case. Attorney Allen Tittle took the matter to trial, and after four days, obtained a jury verdict of $75,000 which is 30 times more than what I was offered. He fights for his clients and obtains justice. I would highly recommend him.
  • Allen was professional, conscientious and well organized. Allen's research of my case produced results in which he was able to obtain a copy of a video from the grocery store and subpoenaed a witness that substantiated my claim and proved that I was in fact struck by the vehicle and injured, which he presented in the deposition. This resulted in a successful settlement in my favor
  • What I liked best about Tittle & Perlmuter was the prompt return of phone calls, always knowing when paperwork had been sent, and knowing I could call anytime and get my questions answered.