When a patient is seriously injured or dies while in the care of a nursing home, families understandably expect answers. Unfortunately, the reality is that many nursing homes will use every legal tactic available to them to prevent the truth from coming out. In many cases, this includes citing various legal “privileges” to prevent the family from receiving documents that might prove allegations of nursing home abuse and neglect.

Cleveland Court Refuses to Reconsider Prior Decision Compelling Nursing Home to Disclose Records to Deceased Resident’s Family

A recent decision by a state appeals court here in Cleveland, Howell v. Park East Care and Rehabilitation, helps to illustrate the challenges families face when seeking justice for their loved ones. This case involves a wrongful death and medical negligence claim against a rehabilitation center. The victim in this case was a resident of the defendant’s home. During her stay, the family alleged, she was “assaulted” and “brutally attacked” by another resident.

More precisely, the victim’s son said the other resident “choked” his mother and “pounded her head on the floor several times” while the nursing home staff “stood by” and took no action. The victim passed away several months later as a result of the “physical and emotional injuries” suffered in this attack, the son’s lawsuit stated.

The issue before the appeals court involved a dispute over the son’s request for the attacking patient’s medical records. The other patient was also deceased by the time litigation commenced, and there was no probate estate opened from which the son could seek consent for disclosure of the records.

And as you might have guessed, the defense was not eager to turn over those records without a fight. Before the trial judge, the nursing home argued that the attacker’s records were “privileged” under HIPAA, the federal medical records privacy law, as well as several other Ohio statutes. Both the trial court and later the Ohio Eighth District Court of Appeals rejected the privilege claims.

In a 2018 opinion, the Eighth District noted HIPAA “allows disclosure of protected information in the course of any judicial or administrative proceeding in response to a court order.” Nor did Ohio law protecting the confidentiality treatment of nursing home records apply, as that privilege “could not be asserted by the estate of a former resident.”

Following the Eighth District’s decision, the trial court conducted an additional in-chambers review of the attacker’s medical records to determine if any specific information could still be privileged. Dissatisfied with the outcome of this review, the defense again asked the Eighth District to hold it could not be compelled to provide the medical records of a former patient who was not a party to the litigation and had not consented to disclosure. The Eighth District rejected this appeal, explaining it was bound by the “law of the case doctrine,” i.e., its prior ruling on this subject.

Contact the Cleveland Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect Lawyers at Tittle & Perlmutter Today

Litigation disputes such as the one described above can extend the time it takes to get a claim to trial by months or even years. This is why it is so essential to work with a qualified Cleveland nursing home abuse and neglect lawyer who can guide you through the process. Contact Tittle & Perlmutter at (216) 308-1522 if you need to talk with an attorney today.

  • I was in a car accident. The insurance company only offered $2,500 to settle my car case. Attorney Allen Tittle took the matter to trial, and after four days, obtained a jury verdict of $75,000 which is 30 times more than what I was offered. He fights for his clients and obtains justice. I would highly recommend him.
  • Allen was professional, conscientious and well organized. Allen's research of my case produced results in which he was able to obtain a copy of a video from the grocery store and subpoenaed a witness that substantiated my claim and proved that I was in fact struck by the vehicle and injured, which he presented in the deposition. This resulted in a successful settlement in my favor
  • What I liked best about Tittle & Perlmuter was the prompt return of phone calls, always knowing when paperwork had been sent, and knowing I could call anytime and get my questions answered.